The above question can be best answered by comparing the model to the more traditional solutions that have been usually proposed by various concerned groups:
1. Building a school? Many organisations and foundations have built entire schools for the needy and poor classes of society. This solution has numerous advantages but how many children can one school cater too. It can benefit only the lucky few who can study in the school. Also, this solution requires a huge amount of funds, time, maintenance, accountability etc.
2. Full time volunteers? There are motivated individuals who have sacrificed a lot if not all of their personal lives to work for the society. But how many such volunteers can a society provide? Is it fair to expect sacrifices of such magnitudes from social workers?
3. “Changing the system?” An ideal solution will be to change the system, increase government expenditure in education to such an extent that the quality in government schools increases tremendously. This solution actually ignores the fact that the government has done commendable work in certain aspects of education. For example in increasing the enrollment figures in primary schools. Also, a change in system brings up other questions like fighting corruption, proper management of government funds etc. all of which will require extensive participation of the intelligentsia and considerable time. A partnership between the government and society can produce better results.